ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To assess the value of multiprobe fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) panel in the diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>The multiprobe AML/MDS panel comprising 8 different FISH probes for AML1/ETO transfusion gene, PML-RARα transfusion gene, CBFβ/MYH11 transfusion gene, MLL breakapart, P53 deletion, Del(5q), -7/Del(7q), and Del(20q) was tested in 40 cases of AML, and the results were compared with those by conventional cytogenetic G-banding (CCG) test.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>With multiprobe FISH panel, 22 of the 40 AML cases were found to carry 7 types of cytogenetic abnormalities, namely AML1/ETO transfusion gene, PML-RARα transfusion gene, MLL breakapart, P53 deletion, Del(5q), -7/Del(7q) and trisomy 8. The positive ratio of the multiprobe FISH was 57.5%. CCG only identified 8 cases with the corresponding cytogenetic abnormalities and 3 cases with other cytogenetic abnormalities, and the positive ratio was only 27.50%.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Mutiprobe FISH panel is more rapid, accurate and effective than CCG in the diagnosis of AML.</p>
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , DNA Probes , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Methods , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , DiagnosisABSTRACT
This study was purposed to investigate the relationship of expressions of gluthatione-S-transferase-pi (GST-pi), multidrug resistance protein-1 (MRP-1), lung resistance protein (LRP) with multidrug resistance of acute leukemia (AL), the correlation between 3 kinds protein expressions and the correlation of their protein expression with clinical features of AL patients. The S-P immunohistochemical staining method was used to determine the expressions of GST-pi, MRP1 and LRP proteins in 80 AL patients and 30 normal subjects. The results showed that there was the correlation between GST-pi, MRP1, LRP protein expression and chemotherapy resistance, meanwhile CR rates of patients with positive expression of those proteins were lower than that of patients with negative expression (P<0.05), so those protein expressions may be accounted for poor prognosis. There was the positive relationship between expression of GST-pi and MRP1 in refractory group (r=0.851, P<0.01). It is concluded that co-examination of GST-pi and MRP1 has greater significance than examination of one kind of protein in evaluating poor prognosis of leukemia patients. LRP protein expression increase obviously when WBC counts >or= 10 x 10(9)/L (63.6%, P<0.05), therefore LRP protein has great judging value for evaluating drug resistance and prognosis of acute leukemia patients whose peripheral blood WBC counts were high.